Authors
Lucy Winnington-Ingram has authored a chapter for the Fourth Edition of The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards: Awards: Challenges based on misuse of tribunal secretaries
The chapter focuses on the evolving role of tribunal secretaries within international arbitration proceedings, specifically addressing the legal and procedural implications that arise when their involvement extends beyond administrative assistance into substantive decision-making.
The chapter includes a comprehensive analysis of recent jurisprudence and institutional guidelines, examining the circumstances under which the actions of tribunal secretaries may give rise to challenges against arbitral awards.
The discussion also includes a detailed review of the standards applied by courts and arbitral institutions in determining whether the boundaries of a secretary’s role have been overstepped, and the potential consequences for the validity of the award.
This article was first published on Global Arbitration Review in June 2025; for further in-depth analysis, please visit GAR - Awards: Challenges based on misuse of tribunal secretaries.
Sally-Ann Underhill and Nick Wright have co-authored a chapter for GAR's Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards - Fourth Edition. Their chapter explores, " Awards: Early-stage consideration of enforcement issues"
When preparing for arbitration, it’s crucial to consider enforcement from the outset to avoid future obstacles—this article outlines key strategic considerations to help ensure arbitral awards are ultimately effective:
Early enforcement strategy – Parties should plan for enforceability at the contract-drafting stage, selecting a seat and arbitration clause that support future award enforcement.
Seat matters – Choosing a pro‑enforcement seat under the New York Convention is critical, as awards can be set aside or refused if the seat’s courts are hostile.
Anticipate enforcement hurdles – Consider asset location, debtor solvency, procedural notice, public‑policy issues, sovereign immunity, plus domestic court procedural quirks.
Leverage proactive remedies – Use clauses for consent-to-judgment, avoid drafting pitfalls, and explore interim measures (e.g. freezing orders) and enforcement-first court strategies.
This article was first published on Global Arbitration Review in June 2025; for further in-depth analysis, please visit GAR - Awards: Early-stage consideration of enforcement issues.
Timothy Cooke, Min Jian Chan and Anand Tiwari have co-authored the Singapore chapter for GAR's Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards - Fourth Edition Part II: Jurisdictional Know-How.
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the legal framework and practical considerations for challenging and enforcing arbitration awards in Singapore. It outlines the relevant statutory provisions under the International Arbitration Act and the Arbitration Act, detailing the grounds on which awards may be set aside or refused enforcement, such as procedural irregularities, lack of jurisdiction, or public policy concerns.
The article also discusses the procedural steps involved in both challenging and enforcing awards, the role of Singaporean courts, and recent case law developments that shape the current landscape. It highlights Singapore’s pro-arbitration stance, efficient judicial processes, and its reputation as a leading arbitration hub in the Asia-Pacific region.
This article was first published on Global Arbitration Review in June 2025; for further in-depth analysis, please visit GAR - The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards - Fourth Edition
Authors