Up until 2017, the United States and Vietnam had upheld a diplomatic agreement forged in 2008 stating that “Vietnamese citizens are not subject to return to Vietnam under this agreement if they arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995.” Between 2008 and 2017, ICE did not generally seek to deport Vietnamese immigrants who arrived in the United States prior to 1995, even if those immigrants had been ordered deported based on criminal records.
As a result of the 2008 agreement, pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants were not subject to removal. However, in 2017, under the former Trump administration, the United States began detaining pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants with deportation orders. As a consequence, Vietnamese immigrants who had lived in the United States for nearly three decades or more were cruelly detained for long periods – for over a year in some cases.
In response, Reed Smith and AAAJ sued ICE and other agencies on behalf of seven detained immigrants in the form of a class action. After the plaintiffs defeated a motion to dismiss in September 2018, ICE largely ceased its unlawful practice of subjecting pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants to indefinite detention. In October 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification of this historic lawsuit, including a Prolonged Detention Class that consists of all Vietnamese nationals who (1) arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995, (2) are subject to final orders of removal, and (3) have been, or risk being, detained by ICE for more than 180 days without a bond hearing.
Following extensive negotiations with the federal government, the parties reached a resolution of the class action, and the court agreed to a stipulated dismissal of the lawsuit on October 7, 2021. As part of the agreement, the United States will provide immigration court bond hearings, after 180 days of continuous detention, to Prolonged Detention Class members who are detained in the Ninth Circuit or Third Circuit. Additionally, the United States will provide regular reports regarding pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants who have been detained for at least 91 consecutive days and/or who have been issued travel documents and will promptly inform the plaintiffs of any detention policy changes affecting pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants.
The pro bono legal effort has been long-running and supported by numerous Reed Smith attorneys and staff, including Corrie Buck, Ray Cardozo, Corinne Fierro, Kelsey Hill, Mary Hong, Monika Holser, Lavinia Osilesi, Haig Siranosian, Jarrad Wood, and Valerie Paredes. Former Reed Smith lawyers Jonathan Gershon, Farah Tabibkhoei, and Tuan Uong also worked extensively on the case.
About Reed Smith
Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm dedicated to helping clients move their businesses forward. With an inclusive culture and innovative mindset, we deliver smarter, more creative legal services that drive better outcomes for our clients. Our deep industry knowledge, long-standing relationships and collaborative structure make us the go-to partner for complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters.
For more information, please visit www.reedsmith.com.