The Proposed Rule covers four main areas: (1) the contracts subject to position limits; (2) the trading limits that would apply to these contracts; (3) the exemptions that would be available to qualified traders; and (4) the processes for complying with or seeking exemptions from position limits. We briefly discuss these provisions below.
- Contracts. Under the Proposed Rule, position limits will apply to: (i) 25 physically settled "core referenced futures contracts" (CRFCs); (ii) their linked cash-settled futures and options on futures; and (iii) "economically equivalent swaps." Part 150 of the CFTC's regulations already establishes federal position limits for nine agricultural commodity futures contracts. The Proposed Rule will reestablish speculative position limits for these "legacy" agricultural contracts and implement additional speculative position limits on seven agricultural, five metals, and four energy physically settled CRFCs. The Proposed Rule also defines "economically equivalent swaps" as those with an "identical material" contractual specification. Inclusion of the linked cash-settled futures contracts and the economically equivalent swaps will dramatically expand the universe of contracts that market participants will be required to monitor on a global basis on the exchanges and OTC markets (with respect to economically equivalent swaps) to ensure compliance.
- Position Limits - Spot Month and Netting. Under the Proposed Rule, for the nine legacy agricultural contracts, the position limits will apply to spot and non-spot months, while for the 16 new CRFCs, the limits will apply only to spot months. Nonetheless, participants will be required to comply with the exchange-implemented speculative position limits for non-spot months for other contracts. The CFTC sets spot month limits at or below the 25 percent of commodity deliverable supply. Because position limits apply separately to physically and financially settled contracts, netting is also only possible among physically or financially settled contract categories, but not between these two categories.
- Exemptions. The Proposed Rule reiterates that the proposed position limits are speculative position limits, meaning that these restrictions are not intended to limit trading that would qualify as "hedging," although the Proposed Rule presumes that all trading is speculative and therefore position limits will apply unless a trader can demonstrate that an exemption applies. The Proposed Rule recognizes the following: (i) bona fide hedging transactions (which include both enumerated and non-enumerated hedges); (ii) spread positions; (iii) certain financial distress positions; (iv) certain natural gas positions; and (v) the transition period for pre-enactment swaps. The Proposed Rule expands the list of enumerated hedges, or examples of legitimate hedging practices, to include anticipatory merchandizing, hedges by agents, hedges of services, and offsets of commodity trade options, with the focus on how risk is measured and whether a transaction meets the "temporary substitute test." On the other hand, the Proposed Rule eliminates the "risk management" exemption unless a transaction qualifies as a pass-through swap or as a swap offset. Market participants will need to closely review the position limits and available exemptions and be mindful of the fact that under the new rule, both exchange-traded and OTC swap transactions are equally impacted.
- Processes. The Proposed Rule also changes some of the processes applicable to the administration of position limits. Under the Proposed Rule: (i) market participants will no longer be required to submit the Form 204 report (the exchange will provide the report to the CFTC on an aggregated basis); and (ii) unless an exemption is self-effectuating (as is the case with enumerated hedges), market participants will need to continue submitting exemption requests to the exchanges (e.g., for non-enumerated bona fide hedges), and unless the CFTC objects within 10 business days, the exemption will become effective.