Interest and royalty addback
For CBT purposes, interest and royalties paid to related members are not deductible unless an exception applies.5 One such exception is the so-called “unreasonableness” exception.6 Historically, the Division has narrowly construed this exception, stating that it applies only to the extent that the related party paid CBT on the income stream.7 But a series of decisions by New Jersey’s courts have called this policy into question. Most recently, in Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Director, Division of Taxation,8 the court held that a taxpayer was entitled to deduct fully its related-party royalty expense where the affiliate paid at least some New Jersey tax on the income—in spite of any difference between their respective effective tax rates.9
Consistent with Lorillard, the Division’s new regulation no longer requires a taxpayer to consider the New Jersey effective tax rate of its affiliate in computing its addback exception.10
Instead, the regulation provides a number of factors to be considered in determining whether adding back interest expenses or costs and intangible expenses or costs would be unreasonable: unfair duplicative taxation; a technical failure to qualify the transactions under the statutory exceptions; an inability or impediment to meet the requirements due to legal or financial constraints; or the transaction is equivalent to an unrelated loan transaction.11
Of course, this change to the “unreasonableness” exception will have limited applicability going forward as a result of New Jersey’s switch to combined reporting. Intercompany interest and royalties between members of a combined group are eliminated under combination, rather than added back.12 So after the 2018 tax year, the Division’s new regulation will apply only to interest and royalties paid to affiliates outside the combined group.
In addition, the Division’s new regulations reflect statutory changes made to the “treaty” exception. Previously, a taxpayer would typically qualify for an addback exception if the affiliated payee was located in a foreign country with an income tax treaty with the United States. However, when the New Jersey Legislature enacted combined reporting, it also limited the treaty exception by requiring the affiliate to pay tax on the income stream at an effective tax rate within 3% of the taxpayer’s New Jersey effective tax rate.13
GILTI regulations
As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), shareholders of controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) must include GILTI for a taxable year in their federal gross income,14 but are permitted a corresponding deduction for 50 percent of the included GILTI.15 The TCJA also provides for a deduction for 37.5 percent of FDII.16
Although New Jersey includes GILTI in a taxpayer’s CBT base and allows the deductions for GILTI and FDII,17 the statute did not provide guidance on what effect this net inclusion has on the taxpayer’s apportionment factor. In Technical Bulletin 92, the Division stated that in preparing their sales fraction, taxpayers should include the “net amount of GILTI and the net FDII income amounts . . . in the numerator (if applicable).”18 The Division later clarified that it was “not aware of any specific situation that would require GILTI or FDII related amounts to be included in the numerator of the apportionment factor.”19
The new regulations leave open the possibility of the Division requiring certain taxpayers to include their net GILTI in the sales-fraction numerator.20
Dividends
Starting with the 2017 tax year, New Jersey’s dividends received deduction for dividends from 80%-or-more-owned subsidiaries was reduced from 100% to 95%.21 For the 2017 and 2018 tax years, the statute provides a special apportionment formula for actual and deemed dividends based on the taxpayer’s three-year average allocation factor for 2014–2016 or 3.5%—whichever is lower.22
This special apportionment was in response to the TCJA, under which certain undistributed foreign earnings were included in a taxpayer’s federal income tax base (and thus its CBT base).23 Many taxpayers complained about New Jersey’s choice to tax undistributed foreign earnings and thought that the special apportionment provisions were an insufficient remedy.
Although Division officials have informally stated that taxpayers may seek alternative apportionment if the statutory apportionment method produces an unfair result, the new regulations formalize this policy.24
What’s Next?
The new regulations are a welcome addition to the informal guidance that the Division released in the wake of combination. But there are still many combination-related issues that remain unaddressed by regulation—for example, the scope of what constitutes a unitary business. So, taxpayers should expect to see additional regulations in the future.
For taxpayers seeking additional New Jersey guidance and resources, we invite you to watch our webinar series on combination-related issues on youtube.com.
The new CBT regulations come on the heels of the Division’s proposed market-sourcing regulations, which were issued last month. Taxpayers that wish to comment on the proposed market-sourcing regulations have until May 15. Because the new CBT regulations were promulgated under the Division’s “specially adopted amendment” authority, there is no official comment period. But the Division will be required to re-promulgate the regulations this fall under the more rigorous rule-making procedures provided by the Administrative Procedures Act, which will provide taxpayers with the opportunity to submit formal comments.
- See 52 N.J.R. 5 (filed April 14, 2020).
- The Division adopted the regulations by “special adoption.” The regulations are effective for 180 days. After those 180 days, the Division notes that it “will propose to readopt these rules pursuant to the rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.” See id.
- See New Jersey Treasury, Division of Taxation, Corporation Business Tax Reform Information.
- For our prior coverage, see this article and this article. The articles concern the New Jersey Legislature’s enactment of combined reporting and subsequent amendments.
- See N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4(k)(2)(I) (statutory interest addback); N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4.4b. (statutory royalty addback).
- See N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4(k)(2)(I) (permitting an exception to interest addback “if the taxpayer establishes by clear and convincing evidence, as determined by the director, that the disallowance of a deduction is unreasonable”); N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4.4c.(1)(b) (allowing an exception for royalty addback if “the taxpayer establishes by clear and convincing evidence, as determined by the director, that the adjustments are unreasonable”).
- See N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.18(a)2. (providing unreasonableness exception for interest addback); N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.18(b)3. (providing unreasonableness exception for royalty addback).
- 31 N.J. Tax 153 (N.J. Tax Ct. 2019).
- Id. at 171.
- See 52 N.J.R. 5 (amending N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.18).
- See id. (adding to N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.18(a)2. subsections i. to v. and adding to N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.18(b)3. subsections i. to v.). These factors follow from the Tax Court’s decisions in BMC Software, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 30 N.J. Tax 92, 115–16 (N.J. Tax Ct. 2017) and Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 28 N.J. Tax 197, 220 (N.J. Tax Ct. 2014).
- See N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4(k)(2)(I) (stating for purposes of interest addback that “[t]he adjustments required by this subparagraph shall not apply to transactions between related members included in a combined group reported on a New Jersey combined return”); N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4.4e. (stating the same for purposes of royalty addback).
- See N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4(k)(2)(I); N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4.4c.(1)(a).
- See I.R.C. § 951A (providing inclusion of GILTI in federal gross income).
- See I.R.C. § 250(a)(1)(A)–(B).
- Id.
- N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4.15.
- See New Jersey Division of Taxation, Technical Bulletin 92, Sourcing I.R.C. § 951A (GILTI) and I.R.C. § 250 (FDII), Replacing TB-85(R) (Issued Aug. 22, 2019).
- See New Jersey Division of Taxation, Clarification to Technical Bulletin 92, Sourcing I.R.C. § 951A (GILTI) and I.R.C. § 250 (FDII), Replacing TB-85(R) (Issued Aug. 28, 2019).
- See 52 N.J.R. 5 (adopting N.J.A.C. 18:7–5.19).
- See N.J.S.A. 54:10A–4(k)(5)(A)(ii).
- Id.
- Id.
- See 52 N.J.R. 5 (adding N.J.A.C. 18:7–3.25).
Client Alert 2020-261