Med Device Online

In addition to a duty to warn doctors of dangers presented by the medical devices they prescribe, manufacturers of highly sophisticated medical devices may be subject to an additional duty to warn hospitals – as the product purchasers – when such devices are sold in the state of Washington. In the recent decision, Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc, 389 P.3d 517 (Wa. 2017) — a case involving a robotic surgical device used to perform laparoscopic surgeries — the Supreme Court of Washington examined the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) and concluded that the statute “impose[d] a separate and distinct duty for the manufacturer to provide warnings to the purchaser of the product.”

Autoren: Michelle L. Cheng Sevana Zadourian

Type: Artikel

For medical device manufacturers, it is of critical importance going forward to limit the import of this decision to the factually unique reasons compelling the Court’s decision in this case.

Taylor And Duties To Warn

The medical device at issue in Taylor was the da Vinci Surgical System, used by surgeons during laparoscopic surgeries, such as prostatectomies (an operation to remove part or all of the prostrate). The FDA cleared the system for use by surgeons who are specially credentialed to operate it and, because of its complexity, even surgeons with expertise in open surgery still were required to undergo “training and experience to operate the da Vinci System successfully.” Experts testified that “confidence” with the device was not achieved until a surgeon had completed 150-250 procedures with it. 

Please visit meddeviceonline.com to read more.