Challenging jurisdiction under the LCIA Rules – the English Commercial Court clarifies when rights may be lost
The English Commercial Court has recently clarified the interpretation of time limits under the LCIA Rules 2014 for a party to bring an objection to the substantive jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal.
Where a party has an objection to jurisdiction at the outset of the proceedings, it has until the time for filing its statement of defence to raise its objection.
The court also confirmed that, under the LCIA Rules 2014, potential claimants cannot bring claims in respect of multiple arbitration agreements under one request for arbitration. Where claimants attempt to do so, the request will be invalid and no arbitration will have been commenced.
The decision provides certainty in relation to when parties involved in an LCIA arbitration can exercise the fundamental right of objecting to a tribunal’s jurisdiction. It also underlines the importance of complying with any particular procedural requirements in commencing arbitral proceedings, as failure to do so can have very serious consequences for the defaulting party.
The full judgment can be found at A v. B  EWHC 3417.
Welcome to the Reed Smith Conversations, a new podcast from Reed Smith, produced by Wf360 productions. Reed Smith Conversations is a four-part series, each a highly interactive discussion on a topic of importance to all of us, perhaps now more than ever. In each episode, you’ll hear from people who may shake up your thinking on issues you thought you already knew well.
- Reed Smith advises Warehouse REIT plc on acquisition of 51 multi-let UK assets from Industrial Multi-Property Trust
- Reed Smith Advises Flight Club on its Merger with GOAT, Creating the World’s Largest Sneaker Marketplace
- Reed Smith Names 2018 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow and Pathfinders
- Reed Smith LLP Advises Cascadian Therapeutics in Merger Agreement with Seattle Genetics