Enhanced, the organizer of the upcoming 2026 Enhanced Games, alleges that the defendants conspired to monopolize and control the international market for elite aquatic sports, unlawfully blocking Enhanced’s entry and stifling competition.

The complaint outlines a pattern of exclusionary conduct by the defendants, including exclusionary and an illegal boycotts and other tactics designed to prevent Enhanced from entering the market. including the adoption by World Aquatics of a bylaw blocking anyone — athletes and non-athletes — who supports Enhanced in any way from participating in World Aquatics-sanctioned events, including the Olympics.

These actions have hindered Enhanced’s ability to recruit elite talent and secure business relationships. As a result, the lawsuit claims, athlete compensation has been suppressed, consumer choice limited, and innovation stifled.

The lawsuit asserts multiple violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and seeks to block the enforcement of restrictive bylaws and retaliatory measures taken against Enhanced and its affiliates.

“Our client, Enhanced US LLC, is committed to bringing innovation, choice, and fair compensation to the world of aquatic sports,” said Edward B. Schwartz, a partner in Reed Smith’s Antitrust, Global Regulatory Enforcement, and Litigation group.

“This case is about challenging entrenched monopolistic practices that harm athletes, stifle competition, and limit opportunities for fans and participants. We look forward to advocating vigorously on Enhanced’s behalf and ensuring that the marketplace for elite sports remains open, competitive, and fair.”