United States v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-00180 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
United States v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-00185 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
United States v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-00183 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
United States v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-00160 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
United States v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-00186 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
International Business Machines Corp. v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-01246 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
International Business Machines Corp. v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-01247 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
International Business Machines Corp. v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-01248 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
International Business Machines Corp. v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-01250 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
International Business Machines Corp. v. EnvisionIT, LLC, Case No. IPR 2017-01251 (PTAB). (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patents directed to telecommunication and broadcast technologies).
Miami International Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Nasdaq, Inc. CBM2018-00032 (PTAB). (Represented Petitioner in Covered Business Method Review challenging the validity of Nasdaq Patent involving system for automated securities trading using a look-up table to route security interest messages).
Miami International Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Nasdaq, Inc. CBM2018-00030 (PTAB). (Represented Petitioner in Covered Business Method Review challenging the validity of Nasdaq Patent involving system for routing of security interest messages in an automated trading system).
Miami International Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Nasdaq, Inc. CBM2018-00029 (PTAB). (Represented Petitioner in Covered Business Method Review challenging the validity of Nasdaq Patent involving securities trading system employing heartbeat or keep-alive signal technology).
Miami International Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Nasdaq, Inc. CBM2018-00028 (PTAB). (Represented Petitioner in Covered Business Method Review challenging the validity of Nasdaq Patent involving securities trading system employing a dual quote GUI).
International Business Machines Corp. v. Trusted Knight Corp., Case No. IPR 2020-00323 (PTAB) (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patent directed to protecting against keylogging malware).
Logan Outdoor Products, LLC v. Lifetime Products, Inc., Case No. IPR 2022-01467 (PTAB) (Represented Petitioner in inter partes review challenging the validity of Lifetime Patent involving a cooking device having heat sources in a stacked configuration).
Zak Designs, Inc., v. Camelbak Products, LLC, Case No. IPR 2022-00803 (PTAB) (Represented Patent Owner in inter partes review defending validity of patent directed to a drink container with a mouthpiece assembly).