Reed Smith Client Alerts

Key takeaways

  • The FDA has redefined the criteria for a food product to be labeled as “healthy”
  • Stakeholders should be aware of these implications and ensure appropriate compliance
  • This landmark rule allows business opportunities for certain food companies to break into markets previously beyond reach

“Healthy” has evolved. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially implemented the long-anticipated rule redefining the criteria for when a food product may be labeled as “healthy.” This final rule, which took effect in April, marks the first significant update to the “healthy” claim since the 1990s and reflects the latest updates in modern nutrition science and dietary guidelines. Stakeholders should take note of the sweeping implications this rule has on labeling practices, compliance obligations, and marketing strategies, and, to the extent they have not already, should ensure compliance and reduce the risk of costly litigation or enforcement.

Why redefine “healthy”?

The FDA’s move to revise the definition stems from growing concerns over outdated nutrition standards. The prior rule, established in 1994, focused heavily on what are now controversial or outdated approaches to nutrition, such as limiting total fat without distinguishing between types of fat (e.g., saturated vs. unsaturated), and allowing products such as sugary granola or breakfast cereals to bear the “healthy” label if they met certain vitamin or mineral content thresholds. Over the years, both scientific understanding and public health policy have shifted to emphasize nutrient quality and dietary patterns over individual nutrient quantities.